Compare · Both
MSP programmes vs Direct clients
Should a staffing agency work through MSP programmes or sell direct?
The verdict
Build direct clients first and use MSP programmes to fill capacity. MSP volume is real but arrives at capped rates, supplier fees and tiered access, so an agency built only on programme work has little pricing power and a thinner valuation.
Reviewed by James Doyle · Updated 2026-09-16
Side by side
| Factor | MSP programmes | Direct clients |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | High and continuous | Builds slowly |
| Gross margin | Capped, minus 2% to 4% programme fee | Negotiated, typically higher |
| Relationship | With the MSP, not the hiring manager | Direct with the hiring manager |
| Payment terms | Set by the programme, often longer | Negotiable |
| Effect on valuation | Lower — replaceable supplier position | Higher — owned relationships |
Choose MSP programmes if
- You have delivery capacity sitting idle
- You want predictable requisition flow while building direct accounts
- Your niche is dominated by programme-managed enterprises
Choose Direct clients if
- You want margin and pricing control
- You are building a business to sell
- Your differentiator is speed and specialism a programme cannot see
Read the tiering before you sign
Tier-three suppliers commonly see requisitions only after two other agencies have worked them. Ask where you sit, how tiers are reviewed, and what the scorecard measures before committing delivery capacity.
Also confirm the VMS billing cut-offs. Portal timing usually drives your real cash cycle more than the contractual payment terms do.
Common questions
What fee does an MSP take?
Typically 2% to 4% of spend, deducted from the agency's rate rather than added to the client's. Model it into the rate card before agreeing, not afterwards.
Decision made? Let's build it.
We back recruitment founders with working capital, back office and operators who have done it before.